본문 바로가기

wat sub!

wat sub! PMQ!

이에 대해 총리는 정책의 준비가 충분히 되었음을 시사한다. 이와 동시에 did the Labour Party, oppose. Every. Single, one of them (노동당은 혜택을 받는 모두에게 반대한다.)고 일컫는다.

Repeating. His previous question, but, can I just say to the right honourable gentleman first of all he, talks about he talks about universal. Credit in my own what we have said with universal, credit is that as we roll it out we have made changes to it as we, have seen the. How, it has been operating in my first months as Prime Minister we cuts the taper rate so, people could keep more of what they earn since, then we've increased allowances, to a hundred, percent of, a full monthly payment. We've, scratched the seven waiting days. That. Means That people get their money sooner, and we've bought in a two week overlap, for those people who are on Housing Benefit the, question. The. Question, is, why. When we were making all those chain, to universal, credit to, benefit, the people who are getting, universal. Credit did the Labour Party, oppose. Every. Single, one of them. //

노동당 총수가 이에 정부의 정책변화에 따른 문제점을 지적한다. 결국 혜택을 받는 모두에게 반대하는 것이 아닌, 혜택을 받지 못하는 국민들의 입자에 서서, 총리의 발언을 다시 한번 받아 친다.

Can. I just give one example mr.. Speaker, of what's happening, take, for example the. Food, bank in Hastings. Represented. By the DWP. Secretary. Its, demand, has gone up by 80 percent after. Universal. Credit was rolled out and the Trussell trust reports. That a, significant. Proportion of referrals, are relating. To benefit, changes delays. Or sanctions, a huge, increase in food, bank uses mr., speaker 4.1. Million of our children, are growing up in poverty last. Week the resolution foundation said that UK child poverty was, on course to hit record measurement. Levels, will, the Prime Minister, take, action, to prevent this will, she start by, ending, the to child, limits, will, she end the, benefit, camp will, she restore, the, 1,000. sure, Start centers, that have been lost under her government. 

그러자 총리는 복지 정책의 방향성에 대해서 이야기한다. 결국에는 국민 모두가 잘 살기 위해서는. 모두가 돈을 벌어야 한다. 그 방향성에 맞게 정책을 가져왔음을 보여주고, 실제 통계가 이를 뒷받침 해준다.

As. We look at the welfare system what we want to ensure is that we have a welfare system that is fair to those who, need to use the welfare system but. Is also but, is also, fair to all, those, people those, hard-working taxpayers. Whose, taxes, actually go to pay for the welfare system, he, talks he, talks about child, poverty, absolute. Child poverty is at a record, low, and we know that a child growing, up in a home where all the adults work, is around. Five times, less, likely to be in poverty than, a home where nobody, works and under, this government the number of children in worthless households, is at a record, low. So when a stanza will you recognize, that, work is the best route out of poverty and will, he recognize, that, while we're talking of work he should welcome the fact that we now have more people in work than ever before three, and a half million, more people than in 2010.//////

야당 총수는 반대 통계를 재시하며 반박하고, 정부의 무능함을 지적한다. 결국 하고자 하는 말은, 정부가 생각한만큼 국민들은 느끼지 못한다는 것이다. Austerity라는 단어를 통해서 드러낸다. 궁핍한 생활을 하게 되니, 브렉시트도 부실할 수밖에 없다는 것이다.

Mr.. Speaker it clearly isn't working because, so many people who, are themselves working, very hard sometimes, doing, two or even three jobs, have, to access food, banks, just to feed their children. She. Used to talk about that just about managing, well they're not managing anymore. Income. Inequality is, up in. Work poverty, up child. Poverty. Pensioner. Poverty, our homelessness. Our, mr.. Speaker, austerity. Austerity. Austerity. Is clearly, not, over, people. On low incomes, are getting poorer while, those at the top are getting, richer the economy. Is slowing. Manufacturing. Is in recession, and this, government's. Shambolic. Handling, a brexit. Austerity. Is clearly not over people. On low-income are, getting poorer while, those at the top get richer, the economy, is slowing. Manufacturing. Is in recession and this, government's, shambolic. Handling, a brexit, is compounding. Years, of damaging, austerity, their, policies, are driving people to food banks and poverty in the, fifth. Richest. Economy, on this, planet, are. Any of these any of these burning, in justices a priority. For the prime minister. //

총리가 받아친다. 최저 임금노동자가  20년간 최대 상승폭을 보였고,직접세 감소를 들며 정부 정책의 현실성을 보여준다. 노동당에서 보여줄 수 있는 노동의 신성함을,  That's, the reality it's. Working, people, who always pay the price of labour  이 문장을 통해 먼저 보여준다.

Right. Honourable gentlemen manufacturing. Is not in recession. Pay for the right honourable gentleman but it is not the case it, is that is not the case of what he says about the lowest earners as I said earlier if he'd listened to my answer, the lowest earners have seen the highest rise, in their in their, pay for, 20, years as a result of the introduction of the National living wage the national living wage introduced. By a conservative, led. And. If he's talking about actually helping, people who are in work let's. Talk about the fact that we've cut income tax to help people keep more of what they are we've. Frozen fuel. Duty so we're helping people where the car is a necessity not, a, luxury since. 2010. Those, measures, have saved working. People, six thousand, five hundred pounds. From. The way the right honourable, gentleman talks, you'd, have thought that he would have supported, them but, what did he do no, he's, voted against them over, a dozen times, and. That's, the reality it's. Working, people, who always pay the price of labour.//


P.S. 아무래도 잘못되어간다는 느낌을 지울수가 없다. 이제 14분까지의 스크립트 번역이 마무리 되었다. 최대한 화요일까지 모든 내용이 요약될 수 있도록 가보려고 한다. 확실히 문장 문장이 너무 좋아서, 버리는게 아쉽다. 





'wat sub!' 카테고리의 다른 글

wat sub! no.13  (0) 2019.03.16
wat sub!PMQ...  (0) 2019.03.10
wat sub! PMQ is..  (0) 2019.03.09
wat sub! PMQ?  (0) 2019.03.08
wat sub! no.12  (0) 2019.02.26